- FEATURED ON CEO SALES STRATEGIES PODCAST
80% of $5M+ companies leak EBITDA; a 20% margin gap can erase seven figures—why assume your valuation isn’t already compressed?
Revenue growth doesn’t guarantee value creation. In fact, it can hide valuation compression.
In payment processing alone, small basis-point increases compound quietly across thousands of transactions. Most CEOs never see it. The charges are automated, the statements are complex, and the increases are incremental. Meanwhile, EBITDA absorbs the impact.
An 80% probability of a 20% margin gap isn’t operational noise — it’s equity exposure. Buyers and private equity firms don’t value your effort. They value your cash flow.
This episode surfaces how hidden credit card fees quietly erode EBITDA, why most $5M+ companies are overpaying without realizing it, and how small inefficiencies multiply into seven-figure valuation loss.
Listen to the podcast episodes also on:
Key Highlights
- 80% of $5M+ companies are overstating true EBITDA.
- A 20% margin gap compounds into seven-figure valuation loss.
- Hidden fee drift silently compresses enterprise value.
- Automated expense creep distorts real profitability.
- Private equity extracts EBITDA most operators overlook.
- Basis-point inflation scales into permanent multiple pressure.
- Assumed stability masks structural margin erosion.
Most companies don’t lose valuation because revenue drops.
They lose it because margin erosion goes unchallenged while growth continues.
Fees drift. Costs normalize. EBITDA quietly compresses.
Leadership interprets pressure as scale — until a buyer recalculates the business and the multiple reflects what’s actually left.
By the time the math is undeniable, the equity gap is already embedded.
About Our Guest
Jeff Shavitz
Jeff Shavitz is the Founder and CEO of Merchant Advocate, one of the largest firms globally dedicated to auditing and optimizing credit card processing expenses. With more than 30 years in the payments industry — including early experience on Wall Street — Jeff has helped companies recover over $350 million in unnecessary processing costs.
He works extensively with founder-led businesses and private equity firms to identify hidden fee structures, correct interchange misclassifications, and restore overlooked EBITDA without requiring operational disruption.
Jeff specializes in exposing margin erosion that most leadership teams never see — particularly inside automated billing systems where small basis-point increases compound into meaningful valuation impact.
Summary
1. 80% of $5M+ companies are overstating true EBITDA.
Most founder-led teams trust their EBITDA because it’s been “reviewed,” “normalized,” or “consistent.” But in payment processing, small basis-point shifts, layered markups, and interchange changes can rewrite margin reality without leaving a clean fingerprint in the P&L. The deductions are automated, embedded in transaction flow, and rarely tied back to one accountable decision. Cash feels tighter, but the cause stays invisible. The risk isn’t a bad month—it’s a permanently thinner earnings base than leadership believes, discovered only when diligence forces the business to prove what EBITDA really is.
If your fees quietly drift from 2% to 3.5% in a year, you didn’t just lose margin—you rewrote your EBITDA without approving the decision.
~ Jeff Shavitz
2. A 20% margin gap compounds into seven-figure valuation loss.
EBITDA isn’t a scoreboard metric—it’s the number buyers capitalize. A 20% margin gap doesn’t feel catastrophic inside monthly reporting, especially when revenue is growing. But valuation doesn’t care how incremental the leak was—it prices what’s sustainable. The uncomfortable part is how quickly “small” becomes structural: once compression shows up in historical performance, it stops being an anomaly and starts being the baseline. In a transaction, that baseline becomes the anchor. Many CEOs don’t learn they’ve been operating with a discounted earnings profile until a buyer’s model shows what their business is worth with the margin leak treated as permanent.
~ Doug C. Brown
3. Hidden fee drift silently compresses enterprise value.
Most processors can reprice accounts without triggering an internal alarm. The language is complex, the notices blend into statements, and the withdrawals happen automatically. Over time, effective rates rise while leadership assumes stability. No single line item looks decisive—until you aggregate the drift and see what it did to EBITDA. Enterprise value doesn’t usually collapse; it erodes quietly through tolerated micro-adjustments that were never explicitly approved. The real exposure shows up when someone recalculates effective cost versus what the business thinks it’s paying—and the gap becomes a valuation conversation, not an ops conversation.
4. Automated expense creep distorts real profitability.
Automated withdrawals remove friction—and with it, oversight. There’s no approval moment, no renegotiation trigger, and no internal “cost decision” that gets debated. As transaction volume grows, inflated rates scale with it, making revenue growth amplify inefficiency instead of offsetting it. The P&L can look directionally fine while cash flow feels strangely heavy. Leadership often attributes pressure to hiring, scale, or market conditions because those are visible. The problem is what’s invisible: profitability is being reshaped underneath growth. By the time the distortion is obvious, the company has already normalized a lower margin reality as “just how it is”.
5. Private equity extracts EBITDA most operators overlook.
Private equity doesn’t assume your expense stack is clean—especially not in opaque, volume-sensitive categories like payment processing. In diligence, they look for areas where margin is being surrendered quietly, because that’s where valuation can be re-underwritten. The critical point isn’t that “PE optimizes”—it’s that they expect to find something. And when they do, it changes how they view earnings durability, operating control, and risk. Many operators believe their terms are competitive because they negotiated once or “shopped it.” PE tends to treat that confidence as unverified until the effective rate and fee structure are proven transaction by transaction.
~ Jeff Shavitz
6. Basis-point inflation scales into permanent multiple pressure.
A few basis points rarely get leadership attention. But in high-volume environments, those basis points annualize into real EBITDA—then show up in trend lines. Buyers don’t just buy earnings; they buy confidence in earnings. When margins compress over multiple periods, it becomes a story about control, predictability, and durability. Even if revenue is strong, declining efficiency can signal fragility. The danger is that once margin degradation becomes visible in the historical record, it can influence the multiple itself—not just the EBITDA number. That means the business gets hit twice: lower earnings and a less generous valuation framework.
7. Assumed stability masks structural margin erosion.
Many companies negotiate processing terms once and assume continuity. But card mix changes, pricing models evolve, and repricing can occur gradually enough that it never becomes “a problem” in any single month. Leadership experiences tightening margins and works harder to maintain performance, often without realizing the baseline shifted. The most damaging part is psychological: erosion becomes normal. And what becomes normal rarely gets challenged. When an exit approaches, buyers tend to test that baseline aggressively. If they find the erosion is structural, the negotiation doesn’t start from your reported EBITDA—it starts from the EBITDA they believe remains after the drift is treated as permanent.
~ Doug C. Brown
Reflection & Call to Action
Most valuation erosion doesn’t feel dramatic. It feels like normal growth pressure. Margins tighten slightly. Fees drift incrementally. Cash feels heavier than it should. The danger isn’t collapse — it’s normalization.
Ask yourself:
- Where in my expense structure am I assuming margin integrity without direct verification?
- If a buyer recalculated my true processing costs tomorrow, what would change in my normalized EBITDA?
- Am I measuring revenue growth — or am I measuring retained enterprise value?
If this conversation exposed uncertainty you haven’t quantified, the next step isn’t urgency — it’s clarity. When you’re ready to understand whether your EBITDA reflects reality or drift, reach out directly at youmatter@ceosalesstrategies.com.
Related Content & Resources
Connect with Doug C. Brown
Ready to Build Compounding Growth?
Want to explore how what happens after the sale shapes your business growth and long-term value?